As device dimensions become smaller with every technology node,
the upcoming devices, including NanoSheets, ForkSheets and complementary
FETs (CFETs), are also getting progressively more complex. Further
abrupt shift is expected with 2D dichalcogenide channel FETs in 2030’s.
Meanwhile, different scaling technology options accentuating Power,
Performance, Area- and Cost-effectiveness (PPAC), and even environmental
Sustainability have led the semiconductor industry to implement
Device/Technology and System/Technology Co-Optimization (DTCO and STCO).
In this ongoing endeavor, the VLSI
material aspects also need to be considered. Atomic and microscopic
defects, a reality in such highly thermodynamically unstable systems,
will contribute to degradation with time (aging). These defects can
trap charge carriers, adversely influencing device electrostatics and
carrier transport. Technologies based on non-ideal materials, such as
gate oxides with excessive degradation, will consequently need to be
optimized to balance PPAC and Reliability. Consider a “simple” but
relevant example: lowering supply voltage will result in decreased aging
but also slower devices. The latter can be partially compensated by
more aggressive device dimensions scaling, which in turn will accelerate
degradation. Obviously, an optimal solution must exist—finding it,
however, may be a daunting combinatorial task.
The
ultimate goal of this work is A. to thoroughly grasp the trends of
device degradation mechanisms in the emerging technologies (through
physics-based modeling) and B. to develop Reliability-incorporating
optimization techniques to down-select materials and architectures for
these technologies, given PPAC requirements and application-specific
workloads.
To that end, the candidate will need to address the following challenges:
1.
First, after thoroughly understanding the different future scaling
options, the candidate will carry out TCAD simulations of promising
emerging architectures (individual devices and whole cells, such as
SRAM), with the methodically-identified vulnerable components with
realistic defect densities to gain understanding of the aging trends.
This step will cover the well-known degradation mechanisms, including
Bias Temperature Instability, Hot Carrier Degradation, Time-Dependent
Dielectric breakdown, and Self-Heating, for realistic circuit-specific
workloads. (These physics-based degradation models have been already
implemented in our TCAD software.)
2.
Furthermore, to simplify and significantly speed up the description of
device degradation extracted from the CPU-intensive TCAD above, the
candidate will need to calibrate i. Reliability compact models and/or
ii. Reliability Machine Learning (ML) models to describe the device
aging behavior and trends and to facilitate the next step below. (The
compact models are already in place; the ML models are under development
in our group. Other degradation mechanisms, such as interconnect
Electromigration and Stress Induced Voiding may be also later included
as well.)
3. In the final step, the
candidate should implement novel, large-parameter space optimization
techniques find optimal device configurations for given PPAC
requirements and specific applications. (Advanced optimization
algorithms are already being implemented in our group.)
To
tackle this challenging industry-relevant research topic and to reach
the abovementioned goals, the candidate will be working with multiple
teams at imec and will be able to rely on industry experts and the vast
existing knowledge in our group.
Selected references: